Volcanic Metallogeny

How volcanism builds the world's ore deposits. Most of the metal we mine was concentrated by magmatic and hydrothermal processes tied to volcanism — and the tectonic setting of a volcano predicts which kind of deposit can form near it. This page explains those volcano→metal links in detail, and maps every Holocene volcano on Earth tagged by the deposit style its setting favours. It is geological context for exploration — not a hazard or eruption-risk product.

🌋 The volcano → metal connection

Each deposit family forms in a specific magmatic plumbing system. The metals, the depth, the host and the tell-tale alteration are all set by how and where the magma rises.

Porphyry Cu-Mo-Au

Cu · Mo · Au · Ag · Re

The planet's main copper source. Large, hydrous arc magmas stall as a pluton; as they cool, magmatic-hydrothermal fluids exsolve and deposit metals in dense stockwork veinlets over the cupola. Huge tonnage, low grade, concentric alteration (potassic → phyllic → argillic → propylitic).

Setting

Continental & oceanic subduction arcs.

e.g. Chuquicamata · Bingham Canyon · Grasberg · El Teniente

Epithermal Au-Ag (HS / LS)

Au · Ag · Cu · Pb · Zn

Shallow (<1.5 km) hot-spring systems above arc volcanism. High-sulfidation = acidic magmatic fluids → vuggy silica + alunite. Low-sulfidation = neutral, meteoric-dominated → adularia-sericite + banded quartz veins. Bonanza gold grades possible.

Setting

Subaerial felsic–intermediate arc volcanoes & calderas.

e.g. Yanacocha (HS) · Hishikari (LS) · El Indio

VMS — volcanogenic massive sulfide

Cu · Zn · Pb · Au · Ag

Sulfides precipitated on or just below the seafloor at submarine volcanic centres — fossil "black smokers". Kuroko-type form in felsic island-arc/back-arc settings; Cyprus-type in ophiolitic (oceanic-crust) settings.

Setting

Submarine arcs, back-arcs & spreading ridges.

e.g. Kuroko (Japan) · Rio Tinto · Neves-Corvo

Skarn

Cu · Au · Fe · W · Mo · Zn

Where an arc intrusion bakes and replaces carbonate wall-rock, building calc-silicate skarns charged with metal. Often flanks porphyry systems.

Setting

Arc intrusions cutting limestone/dolomite.

e.g. Antamina · Bingham skarns · Ertsberg

Alkaline complex / carbonatite

REE · Nb · Ta · P · F · Th

Deep, CO₂-rich alkaline magmas rising along continental rifts crystallise carbonatites and alkaline complexes — the world's premier source of rare-earth elements and niobium.

Setting

Continental rift / intraplate magmatism.

e.g. Mountain Pass · Mount Weld · Bayan Obo

Greenstone-hosted & komatiite (ancient)

Au (orogenic) · Ni-Cu-PGE

Archean–Proterozoic greenstone belts — ancient submarine volcanic piles — host the great orogenic gold camps (gold remobilised into shear-hosted quartz veins) and komatiite-hosted nickel. Not Holocene, so not on the live map — but it is the setting of much of GeaSpirit's second-chance gold (e.g. Marvel Loch), and where buried impact structures like Ora Banda can further focus metal.

Setting

Archean greenstone belts (Yilgarn, Abitibi, Barberton).

e.g. Kalgoorlie · Marvel Loch · Timmins

🗺️ World volcano map — tagged by deposit style

Every Holocene volcano (Smithsonian GVP), coloured by the ore-deposit style its tectonic setting favours. Click a volcano for its setting, rock type and metallogenic potential. Click a legend chip to filter.

Loading volcanoes…

Volcano data: Smithsonian Institution, Global Volcanism Program (GVP) — Holocene Volcano List (open data). Deposit-style tags are GeaSpirit's interpretation of tectonic setting and are indicative geological context, not a resource or discovery claim. Metallogenic models summarised from standard economic-geology literature.

📖 How to read this geological information

Every volcano, deposit and occurrence record shows the original scientific values and a plain-language interpretation. Scientific values are never changed; where a field is missing it reads “Not reported”.

Worked example — Cabezo María lamproite volcano
Scientific view
Name / type
Cabezo María — lamproite volcano, Almería, SE Spain
Coordinates
37.2119, −1.9325
Epoch
Miocene
Age
~8.6 ± 0.3 to ~7.9 Ma
Stage (source label)
Tortonian–Messinian
Plain-language view
Name / type
An ancient lamproite volcano (a rare, potassium-rich volcanic rock).
Coordinates
Latitude 37.2119°N, longitude 1.9325°W (negative longitude = west of Greenwich).
Age
Roughly 8.6 to 7.9 million years old. The “±0.3” is scientific uncertainty: 8.6 ± 0.3 Ma means most likely between about 8.3 and 8.9 million years.
Stage
Within the Miocene Epoch. The numeric dates shown (8.6–7.9 Ma) fall mainly in the Tortonian Stage under the current international timescale; the source's “Tortonian–Messinian” label describes a broader regional interval.
Field-by-field explainer
Epoch
A major division of the geological timescale. The Miocene Epoch spans roughly 23.03–5.33 Ma.
Age
When the rock formed, erupted or was dated. “Ma” = million years ago; “~” = approximately; “±” = uncertainty. A larger Ma number is older.
Stage
A finer subdivision than an epoch. Tortonian ≈ 11.63–7.246 Ma; Messinian ≈ 7.246–5.333 Ma. Note: 8.6–7.9 Ma falls mainly in the Tortonian under the current international timescale — 7.9 Ma is not yet Messinian. A “Tortonian–Messinian” source label may describe a broader regional interval.
Coordinates
Latitude is north (+N) or south (−S) of the equator; longitude is east (+E) or west (−W) of Greenwich.
⚠ Lamproite
A rare, potassium-rich, mantle-derived igneous rock. Caution: some lamproites elsewhere are associated with diamonds or unusual minerals, but lamproite alone does not prove diamonds or an economic deposit at a given site.
Why geological age matters

Age helps relate volcanic, tectonic, hydrothermal and mineral-forming events to one another — whether an eruption, an intrusion and an ore-forming fluid pulse could plausibly belong to the same system.

Age alone does not prove an economic deposit. Whether useful mineralisation exists depends on the wider context: tectonic setting, host rock, structure, hydrothermal alteration, the commodity in question, grade, tonnage, depth, and modern verification.

Understanding uncertainty (±)

Geological ages are estimates, not exact dates. Uncertainty comes from analytical precision, sample quality, alteration, the dating method, calibration and interpretation.

8.6 ± 0.3 Ma means a best estimate of 8.6 Ma with a margin of about ±0.3 — most likely between roughly 8.3 and 8.9 Ma. It is one age with a margin of error, not two separate ages.

Glossary — geological & metallogenic terms

🌍 Plate tectonics — the deep engine of metallogeny

Volcanism is the surface symptom; plate tectonics is the cause. The type of plate boundary sets the heat, fluids and structures available — and therefore which ore deposits can form. Below: how each boundary type builds (or fails to build) mineral systems, with real examples and citable sources. The 241 present-day boundaries are a live overlay on the main asset map — toggle 🌐 Tectonic Plates.

Convergent — subduction zones

Cu · Au · Mo · Ag · Re · (Zn-Pb-Ag)

An oceanic plate dives beneath another plate. Water driven off the slab fluxes the mantle wedge, generating hydrous, oxidised arc magmas — the single most productive metallogenic setting on Earth. These magmas feed porphyry Cu-Au-Mo systems, shallow epithermal Au-Ag, skarns and arc VMS.

Process

Slab dehydration → flux melting → hydrous arc magmatism → magmatic-hydrothermal fluid release.

e.g. Andean Cordillera (Chuquicamata, El Teniente) · SW Pacific arcs (Grasberg) · western North America.

Convergent — continental collision (orogens)

Au (orogenic) · Sn · W · Li · (REE)

When two continents collide the crust thickens, heats and melts. Metamorphic dewatering drives orogenic gold into shear-hosted quartz veins; crustal anatectic granites concentrate tin and tungsten; pegmatites carry Li-Ta.

Process

Crustal thickening → regional metamorphism → metamorphic/anatectic fluids → vein & granite-hosted deposits.

e.g. Variscan belt (Iberian Sn-W, Cornwall) · Tethyan belt · Archean orogenic-gold cratons (Kalgoorlie).

Divergent — mid-ocean ridges & back-arcs

Cu · Zn · Au · Ag · (Co) · Cr (ophiolite)

Plates pull apart; seawater convects through hot young crust and precipitates seafloor massive sulphides / VMS at black smokers. Where that oceanic crust is later obducted onto land (ophiolites), it also hosts podiform chromite.

Process

Decompression melting → seawater hydrothermal convection → sulphide precipitation on/under the seafloor.

e.g. TAG field (Mid-Atlantic Ridge) · Troodos, Cyprus (obducted) · Kuroko back-arc (Japan).

Divergent — continental rifts

REE · Nb · Ta · Li · P · F · Cu (sed-hosted)

A continent begins to split. Deep, CO₂-rich alkaline magmas rise along the rift and crystallise carbonatites and alkaline complexes — the world's premier source of rare earths and niobium. Rift basins and brines also concentrate lithium and sediment-hosted copper.

Process

Lithospheric extension → low-degree alkaline/carbonatite melting → REE-Nb enrichment; evaporitic/brine Li.

e.g. East African Rift · Gardar (Greenland) · Bayan Obo & Mountain Pass (paleorifts) · Mount Weld.

Transform boundaries

— (mostly structural / minor direct)

Plates slide laterally past one another with little magmatism, so transforms rarely create deposits directly. Their value is structural: deep transform and strike-slip faults act as long-lived plumbing that can focus fluids from adjacent systems and localise pull-apart basins.

Process

Lateral shear → crustal-scale fault conduits → fluid focusing & pull-apart basins (rather than melt generation).

e.g. San Andreas (California) · oceanic transform faults offsetting ridges.

Intraplate & ancient cratons

Diamond · Ni · Cu · PGE · Fe · IOCG · (Au)

Away from boundaries, two engines dominate. Mantle plumes / large igneous provinces deliver magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulphides; and thick, cold, ancient cratonic keels are where diamond-bearing kimberlites survive their fast ascent from the deep mantle.

Process

Plume magmatism (LIP Ni-Cu-PGE) · deep kimberlite ascent through stable cratonic lithosphere (diamond).

e.g. Norilsk (Siberian Traps) · Bushveld (PGE) · Kaapvaal & Siberian cratons (diamonds) · Olympic Dam (IOCG).

Boundary type → deposit type, at a glance

Boundary / setting Signature deposits Key metals
Subduction arcPorphyry · epithermal · skarn · arc VMSCu Au Mo Ag
Continental collisionOrogenic gold · Sn-W granites · Li pegmatitesAu Sn W Li
Mid-ocean ridge / back-arcVMS / seafloor massive sulphide · ophiolite chromiteCu Zn Au Cr
Continental riftCarbonatite REE-Nb · Li brines · sed-hosted CuREE Nb Li Cu
TransformNo primary class — structural fluid pathways
Intraplate / cratonLIP Ni-Cu-PGE · kimberlite diamond · IOCGNi Cu PGE Diamond

♻️ The Wilson cycle — settings are recycled

Plate settings are not permanent — they cycle. An ocean basin opens at a rift, widens at a ridge, then closes by subduction until two continents collide; later the suture can rift apart again. This Wilson cycle means a single piece of crust can pass through several ore-forming settings over hundreds of millions of years. It is also why ophiolites — slices of old ocean floor, carrying their VMS and chromite — end up stranded high in mountain belts.

📌 Why deposits cluster — metallogenic belts

Deposits are not scattered at random: they cluster in metallogenic belts and provinces that trace a former boundary. The Andean porphyry belt follows an active subduction margin; the Iberian Pyrite Belt traces a Variscan collision; the Central African Copperbelt follows a Proterozoic rift basin. Find the right boundary at the right age and you have narrowed the search from a continent to a belt.

🔋 Critical metals — where each one forms

Lithium — continental rifts, salar brines and collision-zone pegmatites. Rare earths & niobium — carbonatites along old rifts. Copper — subduction arcs. Nickel-cobalt-PGE — mantle-plume large igneous provinces. Tin-tungsten — collisional granite belts. Every critical-metal search starts by asking which boundary, at which age, built it.

🗺️ Interactive plate-boundary map

The 241 PB2002 boundaries, coloured by type. Click any segment for the deposit families that type controls. Click a legend chip to show/hide a type.

Loading plate boundaries…

☄️ Impacts — craters & meteorites

Confirmed terrestrial impact structures (Wikidata / Earth Impact Database) and recorded meteorite landings (NASA / Meteoritical Society, 51,776 catalogued, 38,246 with a published location). Impacts drive shock metamorphism (coesite, stishovite, shocked quartz, suevite) and locally impact diamonds (Popigai). Click a feature for its fiche; click a chip to toggle a layer. Click a mineral to open it in the Gem & Mineral database.

Loading impacts…

🌎 Antarctic polar view — the meteorites Mercator cannot show

This view uses Antarctic Polar Stereographic (EPSG:3031), in which the South Pole is an ordinary point on the map. The world map above cannot show these records honestly: Web Mercator stops at 85.0511°, so everything further south is clamped onto that line rather than placed. You can switch between NASA Blue Marble polar imagery, served natively in this projection by NASA EOSDIS GIBS, and a dark analytical basemap that draws a simplified cartographic outline of Antarctica for contrast — the meteorite positions are identical in both. Zoom in and the markers grow with the view. Where thousands of specimens share one published coordinate the marker stays one marker, because that is one collection area, and clicking it opens the records that belong to it rather than scattering them across positions nobody recorded.

Loading the polar view…

❄️ Why are so many meteorites found in Antarctica?

Meteorites do not fall more frequently in Antarctica than elsewhere on Earth. Antarctica is exceptional because its cold, dry environment preserves them, while the slow movement of the ice can transport and concentrate meteorites in blue-ice areas known as meteorite stranding zones. Wind ablation and local ice-flow conditions expose old ice at the surface, where dark meteorites are comparatively easy to spot against the ice. As a result, Antarctica contains an unusually large share of the meteorites recovered on Earth.

These concentrations therefore reflect preservation, ice transport and search conditions — not a higher extraterrestrial impact rate.

Sources: NASA Earth Observatory; ANSMET (Antarctic Search for Meteorites), Case Western Reserve University.

🛢️ Petroleum provinces — subsurface context

The world's petroleum provinces, as defined and assessed by the USGS. They are here for one reason: a province where petroleum has been assessed is a province whose deep architecture has been studied far more than almost anywhere else on Earth — decades of seismic, wells, formation tops, temperature, pressure and basin modelling. That record describes sedimentary basins, stratigraphy, faults, traps, depth, thermal history and fluid migration, and all of it is useful when reading a completely different mineral system. Click a province for what the assessment recorded.

GeaSpirit is not an oil and gas exploration platform. The presence of a petroleum province or field does not imply that a mineral deposit exists nearby, and GeaSpirit does not use proximity to one as mineral prospectivity evidence. Nor is the absence of petroleum negative evidence — it may mean only that nobody ever drilled there for hydrocarbons. This layer is context: it says where the subsurface is well described, not where metal is.

Loading petroleum provinces…

🛢️ Oil & gas fields — subsurface context

Individual documented fields, from national regulators — not provinces. A petroleum province is a basin-scale assessment domain; an oil or gas field is one accumulation, with a name, an operator and a licence. The province above says where the deep subsurface has been investigated at all; a field says where that investigation is at its most intense, because a producing field is drilled, logged, pressure-tested and modelled for decades. Click a field for what its regulator publishes.

This is coverage from two national regulators, not a world map of oil and gas. Norway and the United Kingdom publish field-level data that is open and redistributable; most countries do not, or not in a form that can be read automatically. The absence of fields over a region means nothing about that region — not geologically, and not about hydrocarbons. As with provinces, a field is context and carries zero weight in any GeaSpirit mineral model.

Loading fields…

🎯 Mineral prospectivity — where the controls converge

A Weights-of-Evidence model learns, from the 166,000 mines it was trained on, how strongly each geological control co-occurs with a known deposit — then produces a relative prospectivity surface across the modelled domain. Below: the learned strengths, the held-out result, and the most under-explored convergence zones. It is a relative screening signal, not a probability: it ranks ground against other ground, never states a chance that a deposit exists, and only drilling confirms.

Loading the prospectivity model…

⏳ Paleo-tectonics — deposits live on ancient boundaries

Most ore was made at a boundary that no longer exists where the deposit now sits. Iberia's tin-tungsten belt formed in a Variscan collision ~300 million years ago; Bayan Obo's rare earths formed in a Proterozoic rift. To explore by setting you have to reconstruct the plates back through time. Plate-reconstruction models (GPlates / PALEOMAP) let you rewind continents from today to ~540 Ma and ask: what boundary was here when the metal formed? A paleo-reconstruction time-slider is planned as a follow-on layer on the asset map.

Sources & further reading

Plate-boundary geometry: PB2002 (Bird 2003) via the public-domain tectonicplates dataset. Boundary→deposit links summarise standard economic-geology literature and are indicative geological context, not a resource or discovery claim.